Why I Believe In Eternal Security (Part 1)
Let me start this post by saying that I am categorically not denying that the doctrine of Eternal Security can’t be misused. I think it can be, and horribly so. The reason I believe so many people misunderstand and misteach the doctrine of eternal security, is because they screw up on teaching what salvation is and means. If you get salvation wrong, then you are going to get eternal security wrong by extension. To illustrate what I mean, look at it like this. If you pollute a stream at its head, then it’s going to be polluted downstream, too. If you mess up what salvation is, you are necessarily going to screw up what it means to be eternally secure. If you want to get salvation right, first and foremost, you have to go to the Bible, which declares that its central message is the good news of salvation from sin and death.
Contrary to popular belief, salvation isn’t a single act, but instead is provided by God for believers in three distinct stages. As well, there are pre-salvation acts by God that are incredibly important for understanding the salvific process.
Freedom is at the heart both of God’s grace, and who God is.
This post is really a final thought about, and extension of, my sermon series on the distinction between the Law and the Gospel. As I tried to articulate to the college crowd at H20 over the last 6 weeks, the Law is what God demands; the Gospel is what God provides. Articulating this distinction is essential to understanding and living life in Christ.